[OTDev] IDs for features, feature_definitions ...
Nina Jeliazkova nina at acad.bgThu Oct 1 18:58:20 CEST 2009
- Previous message: [OTDev] IDs for features, feature_definitions ...
- Next message: [OTDev] IDs for features, feature_definitions ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Christoph, Tobias, All, Christoph Helma wrote: > Hi Tobias, > > You can also try to define a GET method that returns the local id, e.g. > > GET http://lxkramer13.informatik.tu-muenchen.de:8180/OpenTox/feature_definition/{feature_definition_id}/id > > should return > > {feature_definition_id} > > Added into the feature_definition operations. This approach seems relevant for other objects as well. Should we add /object/{objectid}/id for all other objects? Please have a look at my comment at http://www.opentox.org/dev/apis/api-1.1/feature. Best regards, Nina >> If we use just something like CDK_topoShape as ID instead of a URI, we >> have the problem that this would have to be unique over the whole >> OpenTox system to prevent mix ups. >> > > I suggest to move the feature-definition part to the feature-ontology > (which should use a controlled vocabulary with unique feature names). > > Best regards, > Christoph > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development at opentox.org > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
- Previous message: [OTDev] IDs for features, feature_definitions ...
- Next message: [OTDev] IDs for features, feature_definitions ...
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list