On Oct 5, 2009, at 5:22 AM, Tobias Girschick wrote:

> Regarding problems with PMML. At the moment it seems like we are not
> able to give a PMML representation for every type of model (e.g.
> Toxtree), so in my opinion we should stick to the XMLs for those cases
> until there is either a PMML solution or another acceptable  
> alternative.
> The question is, do we want a mixed solution: PMML where possible (and
> XML on explicit user request) and XML were PMML is not possible?

One possibility is to develop PMML representations for the model types  
not supported by PMML. While it'd still be non-standard PMML, it might  
be possible to send the new model types to the PMML maintainers and  
have it included in the spec in the future

----------------------------------------------------
Rajarshi Guha        | NIH Chemical Genomics Center
http://www.rguha.net | http://ncgc.nih.gov
----------------------------------------------------
A red sign on the door of a physics professor:
         'If this sign is blue, you're going too fast.'