Hi Martin, All,

The reason of asking about 200/202 codes is that in ToxPredict, I would
prefer not to read entire content of the resultURI, in order to
recognise if is a Task, or if it is a dataset, or anything else.

Is there any /prefered way to achieve this in the current TaskAPI ?

Thanks,
Nina

Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
> Martin Guetlein wrote:
>   
>> On Tue, Apr 27, 2010 at 11:24 AM, Tobias Girschick <
>> tobias.girschick at in.tum.de> wrote:
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Hi All,
>>>
>>> On Tue, 2010-04-27 at 11:52 +0300, Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Hello Tobias,
>>>>
>>>> Tobias Girschick wrote:
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> Hello All,
>>>>>
>>>>> we removed the redirect from the TUM task services as suggested by
>>>>> Martin. All Tasks now return the resulting URI and status code 200 on
>>>>> finishing. No automatic redirects anymore.
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>>> Just to clarify - if a model completes execution and posts the result
>>>> dataset to the dataset service, what will be returned - 200 or 202 ?
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>> Now I return 200. How are other groups handling this, e.g. Pantelis?
>>> Martin?
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>> Hello Tobias, Nina,
>>
>> I would expect 202 as long as the task is running, 
>>     
>
>   
>> 202 as soon as the task
>> is finished.
>>     
> I guess you mean 200.
>   
>>  The resultURI of the task maybe another task tough.
>>
>> So in Tobias Case:
>> * model building returns tum-task with 202 while the model is running
>> * model finishes: the results are posted to ambits dataset service, the
>> model service receives an ambit task
>> * tum-task is set to 200, resultURI of tum-task is set to ambit-task
>>   
>>     
> Then how do you distinguish between resultURI pointing to another task
> and final result (a dataset, anythig else),  if both have 200 code ? 
> This can be done if reading RDF representation, but not text/uri-list.
>
> Does it mean we should drop uri-list ?
>
> Best regards,
> Nina
>   
>> Best regards,
>> Martin
>>
>>
>>
>>
>>   
>>     
>>> Nina told me that returning 200 will cause Problems with ToxPredict (at
>>> the moment). What exactly is expected by the validation services?
>>>
>>> We definitely need a uniform solution here. What do other developers
>>> think? I have no problem returning 202 on completion (calculation
>>> completion) if the complete job is still not done (e.g. AMBIT upload
>>> initiated by my service).
>>>
>>> regards,
>>> Tobias
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>>> Best regards,
>>>> Nina
>>>>       
>>>>         
>>>>> @Martin: Could you check if everything works fine now with the
>>>>> validation services?
>>>>>
>>>>> regards,
>>>>> Tobias + Fabian
>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>>         
>>>>>           
>>> --
>>> Dipl.-Bioinf. Tobias Girschick
>>>
>>> Technische Universität München
>>> Institut für Informatik
>>> Lehrstuhl I12 - Bioinformatik
>>> Bolzmannstr. 3
>>> 85748 Garching b. München, Germany
>>>
>>> Room: MI 01.09.042
>>> Phone: +49 (89) 289-18002
>>> Email: tobias.girschick at in.tum.de
>>> Web: http://wwwkramer.in.tum.de/girschick
>>>
>>> _______________________________________________
>>> Development mailing list
>>> Development at opentox.org
>>> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>>>
>>>     
>>>       
>>
>>   
>>     
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>