On Wed, Oct 6, 2010 at 3:39 PM, Christoph Helma <helma at in-silico.ch> wrote:

> Excerpts from chung's message of Mon Oct 04 17:12:18 +0200 2010:
> > Hi Christoph,
> >    What is dimension (number of features and compounds) in this dataset?
>
> If I remeber correctly (both datasets have been deleted in the meantime)
> dataset 3 had ~ 90 compunds/1 feature, dataset 5 ~ 5000 compounds/1
> feature.
>
> I have the impression that our processing times are roughly similar.
> In our system things started to get nasty (1) with a larger number of
> features (> 1000), (2) with complex features using Tuples. I will try to
> generate an example dataset for you to try (might take a little bit
> ...).
>
> Would it be hard for you to switch to "plain" RDF (i.e.  omit all
> RDF:type statements) and compare computation times with OWL
> representations.
>

>From dataset service point of view it is practically impossible, without
breaking everything,  but form client point of view one can try using Jena
models, different than OntModel.

Best regards,
Nina


>
> Best regards,
> Christoph
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>