[OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
Nina Jeliazkova jeliazkova.nina at gmail.comWed Oct 20 14:55:51 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
- Next message: [OTDev] apps.ideaconsult.net down for maintenance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
All, I've added the /sparqlendpoint into API 1.2 wiki http://opentox.org/dev/apis/api-1.2 ( together with entries for superservices and other updates). Hope the link is visible for everybody interested. Nina On 20 October 2010 11:55, Nina Jeliazkova <jeliazkova.nina at gmail.com> wrote: > Hi Egon, > > On 20 October 2010 11:36, Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen at gmail.com>wrote: > >> On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Nina Jeliazkova >> <jeliazkova.nina at gmail.com> wrote: >> > On 19 October 2010 17:18, Tobias Girschick <tobias.girschick at in.tum.de >> >wrote: >> >> I am not sure I get the whole thing. Just to clarify. If I issue a GET >> >> on, e.g., TUMserver/algorithm/CDK/sparqlendpoint the result would be >> the >> >> URI of all ontology servers the algorithm is registered with? >> > >> > Thinking again, it will likely be overkill to have for every single >> instance >> > of REST resource (e.g. have /algorithm/{id}/sparqlendpoint ) . >> > >> > However, at the top level (e.g. /algorithm/sparqlendpoint ) should be >> > ok. Thus, it by definition the returned url should not be interpreted >> as >> > the ontology service, all algorithms are registered with (some may be, >> some >> > not) , but merely a pointer to the sparql endpoint some of the >> sub-resources >> > might be found. >> >> I had originally in mind to actually have only one /sparqlendpoint per >> 'OpenTox API server/service'... so, when I originally wrote: >> >> /service/sparqlendpoint >> > > Yes, I was responding to the example Tobias wrote above. > > > >> >> I meant to have a subfolder *literally*, just like "/algorithm" >> >> One service could indeed also be just "/sparqlendpoint" >> >> But your proposal may perhaps be useful, to have different sparql >> endpoints for the various parts of the OpenTox API... >> >> > Although ambit implementation do have top level entry ( > http://apps.ideaconsult.net:8080/ambit2), there are implementations, which > don't have top level entry for all APIs, but these are different > applications. > > In fact OpenTox API doesn't specify there should be a single top level > entry ... so there is no common single place like /service and this is the > reason I've suggested /algorithm/sparqlendpoint , etc. > > However /algorithm/sparqlendpoint is actually confusing, since > /algorithm/{id} matches to specific algorithms ... we should think of some > other syntax > > > Nina > > >> Anyway, I would be more than happy with one REST service returning >> relevant SPARQL end points... >> >> > > > >> Egon >> >> -- >> Dr E.L. Willighagen >> Postdoctoral Research Associate >> University of Cambridge >> Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ >> LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw >> Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ >> PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers >> _______________________________________________ >> Development mailing list >> Development at opentox.org >> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development >> > >
- Previous message: [OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
- Next message: [OTDev] apps.ideaconsult.net down for maintenance
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list