Hi Christoph,

Could you please paste the post here ... or atleast the subject line
of the email - so I can search previous mails ?

Regards
Surajit

On 6 December 2010 16:22, Christoph Helma <helma at in-silico.ch> wrote:
> Dear Surajit,
> Excerpts from surajit ray's message of Sat Dec 04 13:26:10 +0100 2010:
>> Hi Nina,
>>
>> Heres a question that Christoph asked in the comments under Model API.
>> which makes a good case for having features sets and assigning them to
>> datasets.
>>
>> To Quote ---->
>>
>> URI returned on Model POST
>> Posted by Helma Christoph at Oct 01, 2009 09:07 PM
>> My predictions return not only a prediction_feature, but a lot of
>> additional information (similarities, neighbors, substructures with
>> statistical significance, etc) that do not fit very well into our
>> dataset definition (they are in fact an aggregation of datasets and
>> features). Any suggestions how to deal with such a situation?
>
> In one of my previous posts I have attached an example with such a
> prediction. I works within the current API and needs only a few ontology
> additions.
>
> Best regards,
> Christoph
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>



-- 
Surajit Ray
Partner
www.rareindianart.com