On 11 July 2011 11:24, Andreas Maunz <andreas at maunz.de> wrote:

> On Mon, 11 Jul 2011 10:04:58 +0300, Nina Jeliazkova
> <jeliazkova.nina at gmail.com> wrote:
> > The modified version of Policy service is also available at
> > https://github.com/vedina/Pol
> >
> > 1) table structure slightly modified
> > 2) added connection pool (c3p0) for handling MySQL connection
> > 3) the presence of tokens is verified first, then all other actions are
> > taken (this solves the issue reported by Vedrin)
> > 4) improved exception handling
> > 5) refactored as a maven project (besides all the maven goodies, now one
> can
> > test it locally by running mvn tomcat:run , without explicitly installing
> a
> > servlet container)
> > 6) other minor refactoring for better readability
>
> Hi Nina, thank you for reviewing and improving on the Pol service code.
>
> Indeed Vedrin has pointed earlier to issue 3), which I should have
> already fixed.
>
> > To summarize, an improved version of OpenTox AA (with the newest OpenAM
> and
> > policies extracted from the current setup and imported into the new one)
> can
> > be setup in few days, and will have a better response time and
> scalability
> > than currently.  There is still a problem with increased latency of bulk
> > delete of policies (bulk means deleting several tens of thousands
> policies)
> > , but as far as I understood, for few tens of policies  (as is in the
> > validation use case), there is no such problem.  Vedrin will be sending
> more
> > details about the outcome from the extensive OpenAM experiments he is
> > performing since the last week.
>
> We can probably best discuss in the meeting, where and when to set up
> the new service.
>

Yes indeed.



> I am not a fanatic about cloud vs standard deployments, but would
> generally prefer a cloud-based solution, mainly for reasons of easier
> manageability.
>



> Let me just point at an advertised difference between Jiffybox and most
> cloud services, which is the dedicated resources (in German:
> https://www.jiffybox.de/faq_index.html). I have experienced very good
> performance with JB so far.
>


I don't have anything against the current cloud solution, if it offers
reasonable performance / price rate :)

Best regards,
Nina


>
> Best regards
> Andreas
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>