[OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
Christoph Helma helma at in-silico.chWed Aug 24 13:34:59 CEST 2011
- Previous message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Next message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
> > > > > Question: Shouldn't all feature URIs follow the pattern /feature/{id}? > > > > As we do not have a separate feature store, features are kept under the > > URI of the parent object (model or dataset as appropriate). I remember > > faintly that we have discussed that some time ago on the mailing list > > and we agreed that feature URIs as sub-URIs of other services are ok. > > > > Ok, got it. But does it have an independent URI which should be somehow > accessible? Not that it really matters... Just asking. No, not at the moment. Features are stored in datasets/models and have to be accessed through the corresponding services. > > > Also I think that the triple: > > > > > > http://toxcreate3.in-silico.ch/model/9304/predicted/value > > > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI > > > http://toxcreate3.in-silico.ch/model/9304/predicted/value > > > > > > is not much meaningful. > > > > Agreed, but ist valid OWL-DL ;-). Does it cause any problems - if not I > > would prefer to keep it at the moment, because I fear to break other > > parts of OWL-DL serialisation. > > > > Are you sure it's OWL-DL valid? The validator at > http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator doesn't take into account all > ontological parameters - try Protege for a more thorough analysis. As far as I remember from comparisons a long time ago http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator was rather picky compared to other options (including Protege). I prefer to use external services for OWL-DL testing, because we cannot run bloatware like Protege on our continuous integration servers. > http://www.w3.org/2001/XMLSchema#anyURI is a datatype. I think however > it will not cause any problems in ToxOtis and Q-edit. Coming from dynamically typed languages I tend to be liberal about these things ... > > Best regards, > Pantelis > > > > > > > @All: > > > Please use http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator to make sure that your > > > representations are OWL-DL valid and http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/ or > > > http://inspector.sindice.com/index.jsp to check the structure of your > > > RDFs. > > > > We do nightly tests with http://www.mygrid.org.uk/OWL/Validator (if it > > is not down), but somehow prediction features slipped through. Sorry, > > OWL-DL validation of prediction features should be in our tests by now. > > > > Best regards, > > Christoph > > > >
- Previous message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Next message: [OTDev] Q-edit & Testing results
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list