chung wrote:
> On Tue, 2009-12-01 at 19:25 +0200, Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
>   
>> chung wrote:
>>     
>>> RDF issues and proposals:
>>>
>>>
>>>
>>>       * Change all rdf:datatype= “&xsd;string” to
>>>   
>>>       
>> This is generated by Protege, I guess both syntax might be equivalent.
>>     
>
> It isn't valid according to the online W3C RDF validator though.
>   
>
Both opentox.owl  (available at
http://opentox.org/data/documents/development/RDF%20files/OpenToxOntology/view
) and opentox-example.owl  (available at
http://opentox.org/data/documents/development/RDF%20files/ExampleOWL/view
) validate successfully with W3C validator http://www.w3.org/RDF/Validator/.

Could you post a snippet, that is not validated by W3C ?

Best regards,
Nina