I am getting more and more worried...
Opentox is about collaboratively creating applications and services that 
solve problems.and I am seeing several communicating that we have our 
own "org X services" and not that we have a successful interoperable 
collaborative servuice . ...  this is such a fucked up way of thinking 
for the whole project, I am tempted to call an emergency EB meeting, 
where are we going with this?  And that does not exclude credit issues etc.
Do you have a new OpenTox service that is useful?  Better - are you the 
first 3 partners who have created an integrated service that works?  
Even better - have you got that service working with 2 services of other 
"external" developers!?   If you not thinking this way we are doomed to 
failure.   Come on guys, wake up, get the right mindset or I would 
prefer to ask the EC to cancel our funding next month, than waste all of 
our time for 3 years...
Or maybe someone out there "not yet formally on the project" could wake 
people up with a real, creative, useful release.. I am going to dedicate 
2010 to new project development related to OpenTox ... so I am open to 
new relationships to strengthen our cause!

Barry

Tobias Girschick wrote:
> Dear Vedrin, All,
>
> a first part of the TUM REST Webservices version 1.1 are now available.
> The number of available services is still low but will increase.
>
> You can find the available services under our unstable test URI:
>
> http://opentox.informatik.tu-muenchen.de:8080/OpenTox-dev
>
> The entry page contains a link to the documentation, as well as an
> overview of the available methods. This is subject to change, so check
> back from time to time.
>
> Please report all issues to 
>
> http://lxkramer13.informatik.tu-muenchen.de/trac/TUMOpenTox/report
>
> best regards, 
> Tobias
>
>
>