On Fri, 2010-02-05 at 19:45 +0200, Nina Jeliazkova wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> What would be the purpose of uri-lists in RDF ?
> 

For example, a client asks for a list of all QSAR models on the server.
Shouldn't these be available in rdf apart from text/uri-list? And what
is more, how can you tell what is this list is about? For example, you
want to include in the representation that this is a uri list of all
models produced by the user 'chung' using the algorithm
'http://abc.com/algorithm/eee' etc...



> Regards,
> Nina
> 
> chung wrote:
> > Hi all,
> >
> > I have a little question regarding the representation of URI lists in
> > rdf: Is it ok to include all URIs in the RDF arranged in triples like:
> >    {uri1, type, type1}
> >    {uri2, type, type2}
> > ?
> >
> >
> > Following this pattern there is no way to assign a title to the List
> > itself or other metadata related to the uri list and what is more there
> > is no Ontological Entity (e.g. class) for describing such lists.
> >
> > I think there's a more structured way to do that, such as:
> >   {uri1, type, type1}
> >   {uri2, type, type2}
> >   { someListUri, {
> >                   type ot:UriList
> >                   hasUri uri1
> >                   hasUri uri2
> >                   hasUri uri3
> >                   title "my list of URIs"
> >                  }
> >    }
> > Is there a standard way of representing URI Lists in RDF? If not, we
> > could introduce the class ot:URIList and the property ot:hasUri...
> >
> > Best Regards,
> > Pantelis
> >
> > _______________________________________________
> > Development mailing list
> > Development at opentox.org
> > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
> >   
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>