Hi,

What would be the purpose of uri-lists in RDF ?

Regards,
Nina

chung wrote:
> Hi all,
>
> I have a little question regarding the representation of URI lists in
> rdf: Is it ok to include all URIs in the RDF arranged in triples like:
>    {uri1, type, type1}
>    {uri2, type, type2}
> ?
>
>
> Following this pattern there is no way to assign a title to the List
> itself or other metadata related to the uri list and what is more there
> is no Ontological Entity (e.g. class) for describing such lists.
>
> I think there's a more structured way to do that, such as:
>   {uri1, type, type1}
>   {uri2, type, type2}
>   { someListUri, {
>                   type ot:UriList
>                   hasUri uri1
>                   hasUri uri2
>                   hasUri uri3
>                   title "my list of URIs"
>                  }
>    }
> Is there a standard way of representing URI Lists in RDF? If not, we
> could introduce the class ot:URIList and the property ot:hasUri...
>
> Best Regards,
> Pantelis
>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>