On Mon, May 31, 2010 at 2:07 PM, chung <chvng at mail.ntua.gr> wrote:
>  There is a formal OWL definition of bibliographic entries following the
> BibTeX specification. This is available at
> http://zeitkunst.org/bibtex/0.1/ . I think we could use this in OpenTox
> if we need to assign such a reference to a model, dataset with
> predictions or other resource.

I like to point out two alternatives:

BIBO: http://bibotools.googlecode.com/svn/bibo-ontology/tags/1.3/bibo.xml.owl
CITO: http://imageweb.zoo.ox.ac.uk/pub/2009/citobase/cito-20100528-1.6/cito-content/owldoc/

The latter has my personal preference.

Egon

-- 
Post-doc @ Uppsala University
Proteochemometrics / Bioclipse Group of Prof. Jarl Wikberg
Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/
Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/
PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers