[OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
Nina Jeliazkova jeliazkova.nina at gmail.comWed Oct 20 10:55:54 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
- Next message: [OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Egon, On 20 October 2010 11:36, Egon Willighagen <egon.willighagen at gmail.com>wrote: > On Wed, Oct 20, 2010 at 10:13 AM, Nina Jeliazkova > <jeliazkova.nina at gmail.com> wrote: > > On 19 October 2010 17:18, Tobias Girschick <tobias.girschick at in.tum.de > >wrote: > >> I am not sure I get the whole thing. Just to clarify. If I issue a GET > >> on, e.g., TUMserver/algorithm/CDK/sparqlendpoint the result would be the > >> URI of all ontology servers the algorithm is registered with? > > > > Thinking again, it will likely be overkill to have for every single > instance > > of REST resource (e.g. have /algorithm/{id}/sparqlendpoint ) . > > > > However, at the top level (e.g. /algorithm/sparqlendpoint ) should be > > ok. Thus, it by definition the returned url should not be interpreted > as > > the ontology service, all algorithms are registered with (some may be, > some > > not) , but merely a pointer to the sparql endpoint some of the > sub-resources > > might be found. > > I had originally in mind to actually have only one /sparqlendpoint per > 'OpenTox API server/service'... so, when I originally wrote: > > /service/sparqlendpoint > Yes, I was responding to the example Tobias wrote above. > > I meant to have a subfolder *literally*, just like "/algorithm" > > One service could indeed also be just "/sparqlendpoint" > > But your proposal may perhaps be useful, to have different sparql > endpoints for the various parts of the OpenTox API... > > Although ambit implementation do have top level entry ( http://apps.ideaconsult.net:8080/ambit2), there are implementations, which don't have top level entry for all APIs, but these are different applications. In fact OpenTox API doesn't specify there should be a single top level entry ... so there is no common single place like /service and this is the reason I've suggested /algorithm/sparqlendpoint , etc. However /algorithm/sparqlendpoint is actually confusing, since /algorithm/{id} matches to specific algorithms ... we should think of some other syntax Nina > Anyway, I would be more than happy with one REST service returning > relevant SPARQL end points... > > > Egon > > -- > Dr E.L. Willighagen > Postdoctoral Research Associate > University of Cambridge > Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ > LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw > Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ > PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development at opentox.org > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
- Previous message: [OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
- Next message: [OTDev] Is OpenTox service registering into an ontology service? Which one?
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list