[OTDev] [quixote-qcdb] Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] Quixote project for computational chemistry and future possibilities for Blue Obelisk
Egon Willighagen egon.willighagen at gmail.comTue Oct 26 20:47:44 CEST 2010
- Previous message: [OTDev] [quixote-qcdb] Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] Quixote project for computational chemistry and future possibilities for Blue Obelisk
- Next message: [OTDev] Vector-valued parameters in RDF and over HTTP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
(only to the Blue Obelisk and OpenTox mailing list) Hi Barry, On Tue, Oct 26, 2010 at 8:05 PM, Barry Hardy <barry.hardy at douglasconnect.com> wrote: > I also think there is a great current opportunity to connect some of your > work, CML, CDK, Blue Obelisk initiatives, Bioclipse etc. with the new > OpenTox initiative and we have the possibilities to make "quite startling > progress" in coming months. Yeah, a lot pieces are coming together... > But we must also critically link OpenTox with > pathways, systems biology and bioinformatics too, at least for supporting > the growing integrated service and analysis needs of advancing the field of > predictive toxicology. Indeed... bioinformatics and cheminformatics are not enough integrated yet. > How do we best leverage current knowledge and methods with regards to > biological pathway analysis to design improved approaches to predictive > toxicology that increase our ability to characterise the potential of > chemicals to cause adverse human health effects and including an > understanding of mode of action, mechanisms involved in the mode of action > and the interaction of biological entities, pathways and networks in the > perturbations introduced by the chemicals?/ I think two major aspects here are: * linking the pathway databases back to literature * quality improvement of these databases Work is ongoing in these areas, but need tighter linking to cheminformatics... <snip> > So we really have a Grand Interoperability Challenge almost demanding the > benefits of a consensus-based Open & Public > Standards/Ontology/Dictionary/Source/Data/Access approaches. (All the good > stuff Peter has been driving for in cheminfo for many years!!) Open Standards play a key role here. Both CML and OpenTox have done great things here. > We ("OpenTox & Partners") are organising some workshop activity near > Cambridge at EBI 15-17 November to discuss interoperability, data exchange > standards, public ontologies, and a collaborative ontology development > roadmap for the field of predictive toxicology. In addition to good science > & engineering, there is also an increasingly strong business case driver, so > we also have the collaboration and involvement of the EBI Industry Forum and > Pistoia Alliance. We will also communicate outcomes aggressively with > policy makers and program designers. Quo Vadis R&D progress and success in > such scientific challenges without community, flexible infrastructure and > interoperability? I will be in the area, and if people like to talk about Oscar, please let me know. Predictive toxicology is one area that can benefit from text mining, and I hope I can help the opentox community start Oscar and other tools developed in Cambridge at some point. Egon -- Dr E.L. Willighagen Postdoctoral Research Associate University of Cambridge Homepage: http://egonw.github.com/ LinkedIn: http://se.linkedin.com/in/egonw Blog: http://chem-bla-ics.blogspot.com/ PubList: http://www.citeulike.org/user/egonw/tag/papers
- Previous message: [OTDev] [quixote-qcdb] Re: [BlueObelisk-discuss] Quixote project for computational chemistry and future possibilities for Blue Obelisk
- Next message: [OTDev] Vector-valued parameters in RDF and over HTTP
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list