[OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
Fabian buchwald FabianBuchwald at gmx.deThu Nov 18 20:34:26 CET 2010
- Previous message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Next message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Martin, All, > Hi Fabian, All, > > I will extend the validation service accordingly. One thing I am > wondering: is CDE is a special case of regression, or is it a separate > prediction type? > > My question is targeted on the representation within OpenTox, rather > within the Validation. At the moment a validation object has general > figures (e.g. model, training_dataset, num_predicted_instances, ...). > In case of classification it further has classification_statistics > (e.g. confusion_matrix, area_under_roc, ...). > In case of regression it has regression_statistics ( e.g. r_square, rmse, > ...). CDE is not a special case of regression but somehow related. You can do CDE only on real-valued targets/endpoints. But it is not possible to get regression quality measures like r_square or rmse. > > So if CDE is a subclass of regression, coverage and size would be > added to the regression_statistics. (This would propably only make > sense, if there are models that predict both, the regression target > value as well as an interval.) > If CDE is a seperate prediction type, I would establish a new type of > statistics, cde_statistics. > > What do you think? It is no subclass of regression. So, we need a seperate prediction type, cde_statistics sounds good to me. Best regards, Fabian > > Best regards, > Martin > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Fabian buchwald <FabianBuchwald at gmx.de> > wrote: > > Hi Martin, > > > > for our integrated conditional density estimators (CDEs) we need two new > validation measures, coverage and size. > > With a CDE you predict an interval. For the validation you want to check > whether the true target value is in the interval (coverage) and want to > know how large the predicted interval is (size) compared to the range of > target values in the training set. The formulas of these two quality measures > can be found at > http://wwwkramer.in.tum.de/people/research/research/pubs/AAAI10_CDE(page 4, left column). > > Can you provide these new quality measures? > > > > Best regards, > > > > Fabian > > -- > > GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 €/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit > > gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl > > _______________________________________________ > > Development mailing list > > Development at opentox.org > > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > > > > -- > Dipl-Inf. Martin Gütlein > Phone: > +49 (0)761 203 8442 (office) > +49 (0)177 623 9499 (mobile) > Email: > guetlein at informatik.uni-freiburg.de > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development at opentox.org > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development -- Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail
- Previous message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Next message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list