[OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
Nina Jeliazkova jeliazkova.nina at gmail.comThu Nov 18 20:40:08 CET 2010
- Previous message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Next message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
Hi Fabian, On 18 November 2010 21:34, Fabian buchwald <FabianBuchwald at gmx.de> wrote: > Hi Martin, All, > > > Hi Fabian, All, > > > > I will extend the validation service accordingly. One thing I am > > wondering: is CDE is a special case of regression, or is it a separate > > prediction type? > > > > My question is targeted on the representation within OpenTox, rather > > within the Validation. At the moment a validation object has general > > figures (e.g. model, training_dataset, num_predicted_instances, ...). > > In case of classification it further has classification_statistics > > (e.g. confusion_matrix, area_under_roc, ...). > > In case of regression it has regression_statistics ( e.g. r_square, rmse, > > ...). > > CDE is not a special case of regression but somehow related. You can do CDE > only on real-valued targets/endpoints. But it is not possible to get > regression quality measures like r_square or rmse. > > > > > So if CDE is a subclass of regression, coverage and size would be > > added to the regression_statistics. (This would propably only make > > sense, if there are models that predict both, the regression target > > value as well as an interval.) > > If CDE is a seperate prediction type, I would establish a new type of > > statistics, cde_statistics. > > > > What do you think? > > It is no subclass of regression. So, we need a seperate prediction type, > cde_statistics sounds good to me. > > What about AlgorithmTypes ontology - do we need new type of algorithm in there? Best regards, Nina > Best regards, > > Fabian > > > > Best regards, > > Martin > > > > > > On Wed, Nov 17, 2010 at 11:38 AM, Fabian buchwald <FabianBuchwald at gmx.de > > > > wrote: > > > Hi Martin, > > > > > > for our integrated conditional density estimators (CDEs) we need two > new > > validation measures, coverage and size. > > > With a CDE you predict an interval. For the validation you want to > check > > whether the true target value is in the interval (coverage) and want to > > know how large the predicted interval is (size) compared to the range of > > target values in the training set. The formulas of these two quality > measures > > can be found at > > http://wwwkramer.in.tum.de/people/research/research/pubs/AAAI10_CDE(page<http://wwwkramer.in.tum.de/people/research/research/pubs/AAAI10_CDE%28page>4, left column). > > > Can you provide these new quality measures? > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Fabian > > > -- > > > GMX DSL Doppel-Flat ab 19,99 €/mtl.! Jetzt auch mit > > > gratis Notebook-Flat! http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/dsl > > > _______________________________________________ > > > Development mailing list > > > Development at opentox.org > > > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > > > > > > > > -- > > Dipl-Inf. Martin Gütlein > > Phone: > > +49 (0)761 203 8442 (office) > > +49 (0)177 623 9499 (mobile) > > Email: > > guetlein at informatik.uni-freiburg.de > > _______________________________________________ > > Development mailing list > > Development at opentox.org > > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development > > -- > Neu: GMX De-Mail - Einfach wie E-Mail, sicher wie ein Brief! > Jetzt De-Mail-Adresse reservieren: http://portal.gmx.net/de/go/demail > _______________________________________________ > Development mailing list > Development at opentox.org > http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development >
- Previous message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Next message: [OTDev] New validation measures for conditional density estimators
- Messages sorted by: [ date ] [ thread ] [ subject ] [ author ]
More information about the Development mailing list