Hi Surajit,

Obviously we should introduce multi entity relationships, I am trying to
figure out what's the most appropriate way and how other ontologies manage
this case.

Looking again at opentox.owl, it seems we only need ot:DataEntry (or
subclass of it)  to allow more than one compound , there is no need to
assign features to datasets and mess with changing datasets.  This way there
will be no need to have "fake" datasets of two compounds just to represent
MCSS between two structures.

Best regards,
Nina



On 18 November 2010 10:13, surajit ray <mr.surajit.ray at gmail.com> wrote:

> Hi Nina,
>
> Are we allowing features to be assigned to datasets in the next API
> iteration ? It would greatly enhance the APi as there is no way of
> having multi entity relationships at this moment. As to the datatset
> integrity - we can assure it using the A&A ....
>
> Surajit Ray
> Research Associate
> JNU
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>