Hi Nina,

So the new DataEntry (or subclass) will have multiple compounds and
single feature assigned to them ?

Regds
Surajit

On 22 November 2010 14:27, Nina Jeliazkova <jeliazkova.nina at gmail.com> wrote:
> Hi Surajit,
>
> Obviously we should introduce multi entity relationships, I am trying to
> figure out what's the most appropriate way and how other ontologies manage
> this case.
>
> Looking again at opentox.owl, it seems we only need ot:DataEntry (or
> subclass of it)  to allow more than one compound , there is no need to
> assign features to datasets and mess with changing datasets.  This way there
> will be no need to have "fake" datasets of two compounds just to represent
> MCSS between two structures.
>
> Best regards,
> Nina
>
>
>
> On 18 November 2010 10:13, surajit ray <mr.surajit.ray at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>> Hi Nina,
>>
>> Are we allowing features to be assigned to datasets in the next API
>> iteration ? It would greatly enhance the APi as there is no way of
>> having multi entity relationships at this moment. As to the datatset
>> integrity - we can assure it using the A&A ....
>>
>> Surajit Ray
>> Research Associate
>> JNU
>> _______________________________________________
>> Development mailing list
>> Development at opentox.org
>> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>>
> _______________________________________________
> Development mailing list
> Development at opentox.org
> http://www.opentox.org/mailman/listinfo/development
>